Search for: "Larsen v. Larsen" Results 81 - 100 of 313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The Michigan law, the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, has been on the books since 1976, but weight discrimination cases are rare, Gary Fealk, an attorney with Bodman PLC in Troy, Michigan, says. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The Michigan law, the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, has been on the books since 1976, but weight discrimination cases are rare, Gary Fealk, an attorney with Bodman PLC in Troy, Michigan, says. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Bernhardt, earlier] “The Larsens’ videos are a form of speech that is entitled to First Amendment protection. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 1:10 am
Landgericht Hamburg Author Claus-Joachim Dikiow Licence CC BY 2.5 Source Wikipedia Jane Lambert Court of Justice of the Europen Union (Presifdebt Lenaerts, President, Judges Arabadjiev, Vilaras, von Danwitz, Toader, Biltgen and Lycourgos, Presidents of Chambers, Juhász, Ilešič (Rapporteur), Bay Larsen and Rodin) Case 476/17 Hütter and another b Pelham and others  [ [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:38 pm by Will Baude
I'm also quite sure there are examples of blog posts or other online media having an effect on Supreme Court arguments or opinions, though I'm not sure that all of the examples documented in the article—Walter Dellinger's comments on NPR, the federalism argument in U.S. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:52 am by Benjamin Beaton
In January, a partially divided Sixth Circuit panel (Griffin, White; McKeague dissenting in part) held the case—Guertin v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:52 am by Colter Paulson and Benjamin Beaton
In January, a partially divided Sixth Circuit panel (Griffin, White; McKeague dissenting in part) held the case—Guertin v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am by Benjamin Beaton
Cat’s paw liability under Title IX – On Thursday, a Sixth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Bose v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 11:37 am by Eric Goldman
We can say with 100% confidence that mere adjacency doesn’t constitute trademark infringement (also see my expert report in Larsen v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 2:10 pm by John Floyd
Larsen plans to urge the CCA to reconsider its February 27, 2019 decision. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Joan Larsen] SEC should see its role as fostering, not just reining in, risk taking [Cato audio with Commissioner Hester Peirce; more from Peirce, Cato Journal] Your taxes pay for bad mortgage loans [Hans Bader] “With Emulex Corp., Supreme Court Could Raise Bar for ‘Merger Tax’ Securities Suits” [Stephen Bainbridge, WLF; Emulex Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:44 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
The official explanatory statement of the Bill mentions certain examples of the required “close connection” such as (i) hedging transactions, (ii) lifecycle events, (iii) netting transactions, (iv) prolongations or (v) the exercise of contractual option or conversion rights. [read post]