Search for: "Latham v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am by Dan Bressler
In 2003, the United States Supreme Court established a six-factor test in Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
The petitions of the week are below the jump: United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
Goodman, Rutgers Law School, Ryan Whittington, German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF). [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:26 am
On April 30, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision in The Robare Group, Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge in Virginia has ruled that a defamation claim against Inforwars host Alex Jones can proceed against him and other defendants over the Charlottesville rallies that led to the death of protester Heather Heyer. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
United States The ABA Journal reports that a Federal Judge has dismissed a libel claim in the case of Folta v New York Times, Case 1:17cv246-MW-GRJ, hold that a University of Florida professor’s emails are public records that trigger the state’s fair reports privilege. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
United States Surgical Corporation (1984) Simone Degeling and Greg Weeks13. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
United States California has implemented new blockchain legislation, a move which has drawn commentary from the Hunton Andrews Kurth Blog. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published a single resolution statement and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03262-18 Stein v The Herald, resolved by IPSO mediation 01724-18 Nightingale v Mail Online, no breach of the IPSO code 01108-18 Mike Ashley and Sports Direct v The Times, breach of provision 1 (Accuracy) 01066-18 Gabriel v The Sun, no breach of the IPSO code 01065-18 Gabriel v Daily Star, no breach of the IPSO code 01064-18… [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
Britt Latham Brian Irving In the following guest post, Britt K. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 1:13 pm by Brett Trout
Tam, in which the United States Supreme Court upheld the Federal Circuit’s determination that the “disparagement clause” of §2(a) of the Latham Act was unconstitutional. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Last Thursday, Judge Alsup issued an Order of Referral - a rare step in civil trade secrets cases - in which he referred the matter to the United States Attorney for possible criminal investigation.Judge Alsup also entered an order on Waymo's application for interim relief. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
The unanimity of the justices was matched, to an unusual degree, by unanimity among the States and Central government (appearing as interveners in the hearing), whose Solicitors-General ‘grasped the nettle and decided to present a united front’ in seeking a new approach.[2]The decision itself drew upon both existing disenchantment with orthodoxy (or the lack of any accepted interpretation) and upon scholarly critiques, particularly those of Michael Coper (who appeared… [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
And finally, I've been wondering for a few weeks if John Oliver would weigh in on the Apple v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
United States A Los Angeles businessman has been rewarded one of the largest Internet defamation awards ever. [read post]