Search for: "Law v. Cheek-Law" Results 1 - 20 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 6:22 pm
. - I'm sure this will be an additional entry into Force and Norris's aptly titled (but firmly tounge-in-cheek) multivolume work, "The Law of Seamen". [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:31 am by Katie
Summary of Decision issued December 11, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Cheek, II v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post about this and there were also stories in the Law Society Gazette and on Legal Cheek. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:21 am by Kali Borkoski
In association with Bloomberg Law [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Some proposed settlement agreements may require court or agency approval Cheeks v Freeport Pancake House, Inc., USCA, 2ndCircuit, Docket 14-299 CVDorian Cheeks sued Freeport Pancake House [FPH] seeking to recover overtime wages, liquidated damages and attorneys’ fees under both the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act [FLSA] and New York State’s Labor Law. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 9:58 am by Lee Davis
Police took advantage of the Maryland law which allowed warrantless DNA tests following some arrests, and took a swab of King’s cheek. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm by Cicely Wilson
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:15 pm by Joe Patrice
Without wearing Iron Man Mark V armor. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 10:41 am
On June 3, 2013, the United States Supreme Court in Maryland v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:27 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The forthcoming Supreme Court issue of the Harvard Law Review will feature an essay by NYU Law professor Erin Murphy on the Supreme Court’s recent Fourth Amendment case on DNA searches, Maryland v. [read post]