Search for: "Law v. National Broadcasting Co." Results 1 - 20 of 421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by INFORRM
However, this all makes it more important, not less, that the Turn Off The Red Light ought to be able to participate fully in the development of policy at an EU and national level, and it is unfortunate – to say the least – that the 2009 Act requires the BAI to ensure that advertisements about such political issues are not broadcast. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
Tenenbaum, on the subject of whether a lower court oral argument can be broadcast, will take place on Wednesday, April 8th, at 9:00 A.M., at the federal courthouse in Boston, Massachusetts.Update 4/9/9: "MP3 File of First Circuit oral argument in SONY v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am by Amy Howe
Writing for USA Today, Mike Snider looks ahead to the Court’s decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday was the kind of day that we’d been waiting for here at SCOTUSblog, with the Court issuing opinions in three argued cases, two of which were the blockbusters American Broadcasting Cos. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down by Lewis J in the long-running litigation between the Dyson Group companies and the broadcasters Channel 4 and ITN, Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:51 am by Lyle Denniston
FCC, 11-696, and National Association of Broadcasters v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am by Terry Hart
” But that’s not entirely the case, at least when it comes to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Fox Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
However, the FAPL and Co. were naughtier since they were behaving contrary to the EU's competition laws. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am by gmlevine
” “These rights” (one Panel noted) “derive from national laws and do not exist divorced from such laws,” Antonio de Felipe v. [read post]