Search for: "Lawry v Lawry"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2007, 11:33 pm
Lawrie, (Del. [read post]
6 May 2021, 6:18 am
Co. v. [read post]
An insurance broker may be liable to their customer for failure to obain adequate insurance coverage
27 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
CIA Inspection Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:46 am
Merryl Lawry-White, International Investment Arbitration in a Jus Post Bellum Framework James Gallen, Odious Debt and Jus Post Bellum Konstanze von Papp, Biting the Bullet or Redefining ‘Consent’ in Investor-State Arbitration? [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 9:17 pm
Bernardo Sepúlveda-Amor & Merryl Lawry-White, State responsibility and the enforcement of arbitral awards Philip Chong & Blake Primrose, Summary judgment in international arbitrations seated in England Recent DevelopmentsJohn Gaffney, Should the European Union regulate commercial arbitration? [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm
Check the Beard v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:41 am
Recently, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania stopped such an effort by the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) in the case of Lawry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:09 am
Timmer, The Meaning of ‘Investment’ as a Requirement for Jurisdiction Ratione Materiae of the ICSID CentreFernando Dias Simões, Macau: A Seat for Sino-Lusophone Commercial ArbitrationJuraj Gyarfas, Constitutional Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards: Odd Precedents in Central Europe Fifi Junita, Judicial Review of International Arbitral Awards on the Public Policy Exception in Indonesia Reza Mohtashami & Merryl Lawry-White, The (Non)-Application of the New York Convention by… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:45 am
Morris v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 3:29 pm
” Casey v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:20 am
Judgement Released: November 7, 2011 Link to Judgment In upholding an award of partial indemnity costs said to be “virtually the same” as a substantial indemnity award, the Court of Appeal held, among other things, that “while the trial judge did not specifically refer to R. 1.04(1), and while there may be some disproportionality in the [...] [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:21 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 4:46 am
Here I'm thinking about cases like United Daughters of the Confederacy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:57 am
[40] Concerning the last question posed, McLachlin J. went on to say: This has been considered in at least two British Columbian cases and I refer to Lawrie v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Arden LJ’s lead judgment considers ECJ cases: D.M.Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie, Case 53/81; Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Wurttemberg, Case 66/85; to find: that work will be subsidiary or ancillary if it is done pursuant to some other relationship between the parties which is not an employment relationship, as where a lodger performs some small task for his landlord as part of the terms of his tenancy. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:11 am
60/10 Jackson International Trading Co v OHIM When companies like Jackson Trading Co. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:20 am
Lawry's Restaurants, Inc., Case No. [read post]
