Search for: "Lawyers' Committee v. Garland"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2021, 8:38 am
When President Biden’s nominee for U.S. attorney general Merrick Garland begins his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday, the U.S. government will reach a critical inflection point. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm
Judge Garland was part of the en banc panel that accepted the recommendation of a special committee to dismiss misconduct charges against Judge Edith Jones. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:16 am
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am
Equally important as this intra-committee agreement is the lack of inter-committee conflict. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
O.L.C. __, at *6 (citing Whitman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 8:52 am
And the relevant case, Nixon v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:47 am
The Court split four to four on March 29 in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 7:29 am
, Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
In the first case, House Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
Attorney General Merrick Garland has threatened to sue states that have outlawed or restricted abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:08 am
James Bopp, vice-chair of the Republican National Committee, currently has twenty-seven lawsuits pending. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
The plaintiffs in Jane Doe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:00 pm
The plaintiffs in Jane Doe v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
Powers, BAYARD, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Garland A. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
But, as a practical matter, the committee may never receive it. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
Put all these things together and it is clear that Merrick Garland would have grounds to seek indictments and would be able to deflect any argument that the participants in the seditious conspiracy lacked criminal intent. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 3:54 am
But serious people will realize all of this and, as they watch the senators on the judiciary committee speechify in lieu of questions and bemoan the potential fate of Roe v. [read post]
