Search for: "Leahy v. Leahy" Results 21 - 40 of 784
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2010, 12:32 pm by Vincent LoTempio
In an effort to push forward patent reform,  Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:12 pm by Kate Howard
LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:35 pm
In Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 794, the Federal Court dismissed ACCC's application against 18 respondents for civil penalties  relating to its allegations of the fixing of retail prices of petrol in the Geelong retail petrol market. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 7:25 am by Tamara Tabo
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Allen Ryan Alleyne, Alleyne v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 12:09 pm
In a different post, Quinn writes about KSR v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:35 am by Jeralyn
What it does: The amendment would undo a unanimous Supreme Court decision (United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:19 am by Marty Schwimmer
Here is a post about the MONSTER v VERMONSTER trademark dispute, which dispute Senator Leahy denounced as 'trademark bullying,' when introducing the Trademark Technical and Conforming Amendment Act of 2010. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 8:48 pm
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy today opened up a committee hearing on the Supreme Court and preemption with an aggressive anti-court, anti-business statement. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 7:46 am by Adam Steinman
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued a 7-2 decision in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 8:47 pm by Patent Docs
The Federal Circuit improved this situation in its en banc decision in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
On May 11, Whitehouse introduced the Big Oil Polluter Pays Act to overturn the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:33 pm by George Ticoras, Esq.
Leahy argues in his press release, “The hearing comes on the heels of the Court’s McCutcheon v. [read post]