Search for: "Leahy v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm
United States Postal Service Issue: Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
LEAHY (for himself and Mr. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am
In Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am
In Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:14 am
Skilling, United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 8:14 pm
–(A must-have for Tillis)Philips claim construction required — (PTAB existing practice, but not statutory)PTAB judges may not communicate with superiors on case specifics except as allowed by the Code of Conduct for Unites States Judges. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:28 am
Today’s en banc decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Aqua Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 12:40 pm
" The First then says that it already concluded in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 5:47 pm
UnwiredPlanet, 841 F.3d at 1382.[ Appeal from the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:08 am
If these representations contradict arguments made during prosecution of a patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), they may serve as the basis for an inequitable conduct finding. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:08 am
If these representations contradict arguments made during prosecution of a patent at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), they may serve as the basis for an inequitable conduct finding. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:55 am
The Supreme Court in Gross v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 10:09 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on Monday in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm
United States Postal Service, which will determine if the government is able to initiate review proceedings for patents. [read post]
22 May 2014, 2:11 pm
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, the United States House of Representatives passed the Innovation Act by a vote of 325-91. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 12:38 pm
(MGI), a Minnesota pharmaceutical company that markets and distributes drugs in the United States. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 10:05 am
” Pfaff v. [read post]
