Search for: "Leahy v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2012, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:58 am
Leahy). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:18 pm
Marion County, upholding a stringent state voter ID law, and Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm
First, it creates an emergency exception allowing the government to continue targeting “roamers”—people lawfully targeted as non-United States persons located outside the United States, but who suddenly show up in the United States—for a brief period of time after they show up in the United States, so long as “a lapse in the targeting of such non-United States person poses a threat… [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am
The biggest news out of the Court yesterday was the opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm
Last week, the Fourth Circuit in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
First, it creates an emergency exception allowing the government to continue targeting “roamers”—people lawfully targeted as non-United States persons located outside the United States, but who suddenly show up in the United States—for a brief period of time after they show up in the United States, so long as “a lapse in the targeting of such non-United States person poses a threat… [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am
§ 102(b)) prohibited patenting an invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 11:56 am
For 22 years, since the money laundering statutes enactment in 1986, courts have construed "proceeds" to mean gross receipts and not net profits of illegal activity consistent with the original intent of Congress.But in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 6:01 pm
Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:51 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a major decision interpreting provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA), specifically the AIA on-sale bar provisions. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.) and Pedersen v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
(collectively, “MadStad”) filed suit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), its then director, David Kappos, in his official capacity, and the United States of America (collectively, “the Government”) in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:15 am
United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
As United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:19 am
It seems that they were persuaded by a 2010 appellate court decision (a case called United States v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
10 May 2016, 2:05 pm
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
” State Laws Forcing Publishers to License Ebooks to Libraries Are Unlawful [PDF] — A new white paper from Free State Foundation explains, “As the District Court in AAP v. [read post]
