Search for: "Lee v. Clark*"
Results 141 - 160
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd & Ors (NI), heard 1-2 May 2018. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 10:14 am
Lee Barta v. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 6:52 am
” In Yebuah v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:37 pm
I haven't seen such a case since the sixties.Then there is Lee v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mary Ziegler, Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Election Administration to Avoid Electoral Meltdown, 62 Washington & Lee Law Review 937 (2005) Rethinking the Unconstitutionality of Contribution and Expenditure Limits in Ballot Measure Campaigns, 78 Southern California Law Review 885 (2005) Congressional Power to Renew the Preclearance Provisions of the Voting Rights Act after Tennessee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Microsoft v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:57 am
FeesIn September last year, Andy Lee from Brandsmiths (in an IPKat article here) provoked a discussion on the impact of the hike in High Court fees on IP claims. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 6:07 am
Gideon v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 7:29 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Breen & Lee J. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
City of Pontiac Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitRONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
I, Jackson v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am
Clark, here; patent-venue case TC Heartland LLP v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:02 pm
Clarke PART V: NEW THEORY 22. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
O’Donnell v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:10 am
Humberstone, R (on the application of) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 760 (Admin) (13 April 2010) Read judgment It would seem that legal aid is the topic of the day. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 4:03 pm
Significant cases reported in English for the first time are * Sara Lee Meats Europe BV v Ladyberg SpA (Court of Bergamo, Italy) - infringement action involving invisible underwear for ladies and calculation of damages;Left: not all cats wear invisible underwear, it seems* Adidas International v FDB (Maritime and Commercial Court, Denmark) - yes, you've guessed it, it's another three-stripe case. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:22 pm
Justus et al v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:54 am
Lee v. [read post]
