Search for: "Lee v. US Postal Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
But there is a debate—indeed, a circuit split—about whether Article 10(a) affirmatively authorizes service by postal channels (Ackermann v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
Postal Service, Docket No. 17-1594, J. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Lee (D. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:49 pm
OpinionShort Title/District 07a0458p.06 Ilic-Lee v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Postal Service will pay $120 million over the next five years to a major logistics contractor that Postmaster General Louis DeJoy previously helped lead and with which his family maintains financial ties. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 5:01 am
A recent case, Gyorgy v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 2:59 pm
Lee, 782 F.3d 1376, 1379 (Fed. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:09 pm
US Services, 174 N.J. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
DeJoy affirmed that the Postal Service will continue to prioritize ballots over other mail. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Foster Co. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Foster Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
We cover the drafting, enactment and evolving enforcement of the obscenity statute over decades when the postal service was the nation’s primary network of communication, well before modern understandings of the First Amendment. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Because she filed this lawsuit almost seven months after the Postal Service denied her claim, because the Act requires claimants to file their claims within six months of the agency's written denial of the claim and because her alternative readings of the Act are unconvincing, we affirm. 08a0240p.06 2008/07/03 USA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
Because she filed this lawsuit almost seven months after the Postal Service denied her claim, because the Act requires claimants to file their claims within six months of the agency's written denial of the claim and because her alternative readings of the Act are unconvincing, we affirm. 08a0240p.06 2008/07/03 USA v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Canada The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is dismissed in Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:45 am
Boston Insulated Wire & Cable Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:41 am
Both the Supreme Court in the seminal Reno v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 2:00 am
Lee’s contribution to this symposium), my read is that his evidence is largely evolutionary. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Implements a number of provisions to improve the integrity of the program by improving use of the electronic systems states use to detect and prevent fraud and those employers use to communicate with the state unemployment agency, and provides the Department of Labor with additional authority to hold states accountable for their performance. [read post]
