Search for: "Lemley v. Lemley"
Results 121 - 140
of 614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
Teleflex: [According to the book, The Brethren,] a 1975 patent case named Sakraida v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 5:22 pm
Mark Randazza comments here on Judge Legrome Davis's recent denial of a motion to dismiss in Ciolli v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 10:55 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 12:19 am
***Note the post on Patently-O about Microsoft Corp. v. z4 Tech. [read post]
9 May 2013, 2:54 pm
To be clear, Professor Lemley is the U.S. patent law expert, in general. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 8:30 am
John Allison has done some great empirical work on patent litigation, including a recent project with Mark Lemley and David Schwartz on all substantive decisions rendered by any court in every patent case filed in 2008 and 2009 (with articles in Texas and Chicago), and a project on repeat patent litigants with Mark Lemley and Joshua Walker that I blogged about back in 2011. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:42 am
On the one hand, states can expand federal IP rights beyond the scope allowed by federal law – for instance, by sanctioning contract rules that restrict buyers' use of copyrighted materials (held enforceable in ProCD v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
”DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:25 am
The Supreme Court has recently agreed to hear the case of Teva Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:09 pm
The case -- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 8:25 pm
Mark Lemley and Rob Merges just filed a Federal Circuit amicus brief on behalf of 42 IP professors in Helsinn v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 10:32 am
Lemley, The (Unnoticed) Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents, 59 Stan. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:56 pm
The merits brief, coordinated by Mark Lemley, Timothy Holbrook, and Lynda Oswald, argues that the Court should reject the "deliberate indifference" standard articulated by the Federal Circuit in SEB, and instead hold that inducement require that the defendant "be aware of a patent and encourage an act that it knows or should know would infringe that patent. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:39 am
Mullin later mentioned LabCorp v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
Press v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 2:06 pm
By Jason Rantanen Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:33 am
A highlight was the “JZ v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 2:01 am
You can spend $130 million a year advertising (Advantage Rent-a-Car v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
[The case, in the Southern District of NY, is captioned “Puerto 80 Projects v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:33 am
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership (Supreme Court 2011) The patent act indicates that issued patents are "presumed valid. [read post]
