Search for: "Levi Strauss & Co. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co."
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co., 633F.3d 1158, 1175 (9th Cir. 2011). [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Company, found no basis for the standard. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded a district court opinion which found Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. did not dilute Levi Strauss’s registered mark, the “Arcuate” design. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:22 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 7:53 pm
The case cite is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 3:40 am
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 6:50 pm
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm
The case cite is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 10:32 am
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Instead, in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:13 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx? [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:12 pm
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 12:40 pm
The court logically cites Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard: Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:35 am
The 9th Circuit's recent decision in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance)… [read post]
