Search for: "Levy v. Cir"
Results 101 - 120
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2010, 7:51 pm
Nonetheless, the court opined that the argument did not withstand the foregoing logic and the express language of Maryland Rule 2-643 (c) which states, “Upon motion of the judgment debtor, the court may release some or all of the property from a levy if it finds that (1) the judgment has been vacated. . . . [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 3:11 pm
The issue presented in Doe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:20 am
Xcentric Venture, 199 Fed.Appx. 738 (11th Cir. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 8:08 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Paul Alan Levy (Public Citizen) and Oliver Edwards are defending against the claims (in Joe Johnson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 11:09 am
See UMG v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
” The Ninth Circuit held that both eBay’s and the District Court’s reading of its previous decision in Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Brown & Root, Inc., 207 F.3d 717 (4th Cir. 2000); Brown & Kerr Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:27 am
Cir. 2014) (“It is not enough to say that . . . to do so would ‘have been obvious to one of ordinary skill. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:04 pm
App. 3 Cir. 9/28/2016), 2016 WL 5404650 [3] See id. [4] In XXI Oil & Gas, the Defendant advanced this position. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:41 am
By Eric Goldman In the Second Circuit appeal of Rescuecom v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
Cir. 2008). [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Levy v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 6:49 am
by Dennis Crouch Ericsson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
Paul Levy comments. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 10:32 am
Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 8:54 pm
In Levy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 10:15 am
” When Trafigura challenged the denial, the government argued that the levy was not a prohibited tax on exports but a “user fee,” citing United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:02 am
Court of Appeals decided Cedar Lake Nursing Home v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 7:19 pm
The case cite is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
