Search for: "Light v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 41 - 60 of 231
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Post 9/11 spending on border fencing and related infrastructure (things like lighting and roads) rose dramatically. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”The decision reports that the New York State Comptroller had approved both an accidental disability retirement allowance pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law §363, and a performance-of-duty disability retirement allowance pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law §363-c for Masullo. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:51 am
The IRS could have done a computer search through the DMV, contacted Terrell's employer, searched using Terrell’s social security number, or undertaken any number of actions that might have located the Dallas address. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Because Section 18 lays out an extensive series of procedural steps, we will have ample opportunity to review our efforts in light of any new developments. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am by Andres
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
This Court’s jurisprudence recognises that Convention rights are not applied in a vacuum2 but are to be interpreted in light of and in harmony with other international law standards and obligations,3 including under treaty and customary international law.4 1 United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCRH), Report: Analytical study on the relationship between climate change and the full and effective enjoyment of the rights of the child, 4 May 2017,… [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
The so-called "green light partnership" requires participating businesses in Detroit to maintain a minimum standard of lighting on their premises, and also requires installation of high-definition security cameras that feed directly into the DPD's computer network.Most of the current green light partners are gas stations and liquor stores; high-profile crime targets. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:00 am by Catherine Coulter
With regard to the Privacy Commissioner’s findings, the use of video surveillance and GPS is generally not permitted for productivity management although it may be permitted if the employer can show a bona fide safety or security reason for the surveillance. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Niamh Quille, Leigh Day
Conclusion The potential impact of any judgment of the CJEU on the exportability of these benefits, and its interpretation by the Supreme Court remains to be seen, but it is another case raising the pertinent issue of free movement and social security in Europe (see the recent CJEU judgment in Jobcenter Berlin Neukölln v Nazifa, Sonita, Valentina and Valentino Alimanovic (C-67/14). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In light of the foregoing Federal and state statutes and regulations, it is clear that Hammond did not jeopardize her own eligibility for Medicaid by transferring her monthly income into the SNT for the benefit of her son, who was both disabled and under 65 years of age (see Reames v State of Oklahoma, 411 F3d at 1164; Estate Planning for a Family with a Special Needs Child, 23 Probate & Property at 16). [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Finding that there is a "significant public interest" in the requested materials, which may shed light on whether this matter was adequately investigated, the court indicated that SCI: 1. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:25 pm by Barry Sookman
The court in Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner [2014] IEHC 310 (18 June 2014), questioned whether the Directive and the EU Commissioner’s Decision needed to be re-evaluated in the light of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and whether the Commissioner could look beyond or otherwise disregard the Community finding. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Canada Littler has a post entitled Ontario, Canada: New “False Light” Privacy Tort and How It Might Impact Employers dealing with the case of Yenovkian v. [read post]