Search for: "Light v. Lang" Results 121 - 140 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
No such constraints appear to have operated in other areas of New Zealand law, and the case had in fact been sent back to New Zealand by the Privy Council to reconsider the proceedings in light of the Reynolds principles (Lange v Atkinson [2000] 1 NZLR 257), so I view these perceived differences with some suspicion. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 3:33 am by CMS
Decision at first Instance The case was referred by Mrs Justice Lang to the High Court to determine the preliminary issue of whether the application for judicial review had been bought in time. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am by Kate O’Sullivan (Bristows)
Instead, Meade J had found that, having read AU 288 in light of the common general knowledge, it was not obvious to try mirabegron as a treatment for OAB with a reasonable expectation of success. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:30 am by Shaunna Mireau
In light of these requirements, it is important to note that, despite the need for proof, the cost of proving the expenditures for computer research should not exceed the amount claimed (see: Almecon Industries Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:19 am by Philipp Widera
Whether this is sufficient is at least questionable (especially in cases of a concurrent participation in rebate schemes in light of the Pregabalin-decision). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 10:11 am by WSLL
Waller of Sneed Lang Herrold PC, Tulsa, Oklahoma. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:16 am by WSLL
Waller of Sneed Lang Herrold PC, Tulsa, Oklahoma. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
In light of these observations, the court found that the claim was not to a computer program at all so the exclusion was not invoked. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:28 pm by Josh Blackman
My tentative conclusion is the Establishment Clause, in light of foreign policy concerns and Congress’s plenary powers over naturalization, simply has not applied with full force to immigration law. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:49 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming summary judgment, the First Circuit also refused to reinstate her retaliation claim since she failed to refute Wal-Mart’s assertion that it fired her almost two years later because she failed to submit medical papers to support her need for medical leave for an unrelated arm injury (Lang v. [read post]