Search for: "Likely v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 90,811
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm by Fuzzy Slippers
The post Like a Boss: Ron DeSantis Wipes the Floor With Gavin Newsom in Red State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:42 am by Felicia Kornbluh
State (1999), which found that the state was obliged under the state constitution to provide something like marriage to same-sex couples, was sworn onto the bench of the Vermont Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:56 am by Madeleine O'Neill
As other states enact abortion bans, Maryland is likely to become something of a sanctuary state for women seeking to terminate pregnancies, said Del. ... [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 11:01 am
  Looks like a significant victory for State Farm -- flood exclusion upheld, anti-concurrent cause provision upheld, Fifth Circuit avoided some of the folly of another panel of the court in Leonard v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:33 pm by Michael DelSignore
United States Supreme Court Likely to Dramatically Change Access To Abortion in Summer 2022  As of now, abortion is considered a constitutional right under Roe v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 7:25 am by Immigration Prof
Minutes ago, the Supreme Court not surprisingly granted cert not surprisingly in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:25 am by Kayla Campbell
 While Dowl argued for de novo review under United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 2:02 am
R (Bary) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Al Fawwaz) v Same [2009] EWHC 2068(Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 284 “When considering the lawfulness of extradition by reference to the likely prison conditions which a person, if extradited, would face upon conviction in the requesting country, the question whether the high threshold under art [...] [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:13 am by Jack Chin
United States rely on the 1876 decision of Chy Lung v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:57 am by Wells Bennett
Likely you've heard: The United States last week petitioned for the full Fourth Circuit to rehear United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
North Dakota, “that a State may not require out-of-state sellers of goods or services to collect that State’s sales/use tax, unless the out-of-state seller has some ‘physical presence’ in the State – a retail outlet, warehouse, office, or the like” This term’s case of South Dakota v. [read post]