Search for: "Lilly v. Commissioner"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co v Actavis UK Ltd & Ors, heard 4-6 Apr 2017. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor, heard 13-14 Mar 2017. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In Zamora v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
CA RIAs to pooled investment vehicles may avoid the independent party and surprise examinations requirements by having audited financial statements prepared by an independent public accountant registered with the PCAOB and distributing such audited financial statements to all limited partners (or members or other beneficial owners) of the pooled investment vehicle, and to the Commissioner of the California Department of Business Oversight (“DBO”). [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:30 am
WILLIAMS, COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
” In Pason Systems Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 394 F. [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:30 am
by Pamela Samuelson http://t.co/ApIa061WmO -> Refresher Q&A on Oracle v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 5:30 am
Rogers explains why it came last in Netflix rankings http://t.co/c0tGfLBb6e -> Interes Actavis UK v Eli Lilly & Company [2014] EWHC 1511 http://t.co/1Cw5ucuStG – patent judgment dealing with multi-jurisdictional claims -> Appeal allowed- reasons to follow Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Can't Escape Hotfile's Claim of Abusing Anti-Piracy Tool http://t.co/E7PLsMuYNK via @feedly -> Link to Disney v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Although this claim was not considered on its merits because it was time barred, the court (in preliminary proceedings) accepted that patent assignments may “unduly” lessen competition where “the assignment increases the assignees' market power in excess of that inherent in the patent rights assigned” (Eli Lilly v Apotex 2009 FC 991 at para. 750, 881, aff’d 2010 FCA 240; see also Apotex v Eli Lilly 2005 FCA 361). [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Supreme Court The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 34 (18 July 2012) Munir & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 32 (18 July 2012) Alvi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 33 (18 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Horn & Ors v Commercial Acceptances Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 958 (19 July 2012) Maidment v… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
By Eric Goldman Earlier this month, I attended an event at University of Colorado Boulder called “The Economics of Privacy,” sponsored by the Silicon Flatirons center. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 July 2011. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 July 2011. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
v. [read post]
