Search for: "Lilly v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 917
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
The proposition being debated was whether in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and the ongoing Actavis v Eli Lilly case we were seeing a Dutch-style territorial grab for jurisdiction or that in the words of one clever barrister a "phantom menace"? [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
River Birch,Inc., 920 F.3d 958, 964 (5th Cir. 2019); Eli Lilly & Co. v.Hospira, Inc., 933 F.3d 1320, 1327 (Fed. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
”Henry loved when he was in "shear mode"Claim "Interpretation"  - it is all about what you say and disclaimWith the old "Construction" heading now replaced with "Interpretation", Mr Justice Carr stated he would be applying"principles concerning normal interpretation and equivalents set out by the Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48, [2018] and by the Patents Court in Mylan v Yeda [2017] EWHC… [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:13 am by Mary Anne Peck
The state joins a growing list of GOP-led states that have embraced expanded postpartum Medicaid coverage since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:20 pm by Floyd J. Dugas
  The statute applies retroactively back to May 27, 2007.The Ledbetter Act was passed in direct response to the United States Supreme Court decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 10:22 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
During Lilly’s clinical trials for pemetrexed, anumber of fatalities occurred. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:10 pm
--Noel v The Boeing Co., 3rdCir, October 1, 2010: in an issue of first impression in the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit regarding the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, the Court holds that the appellant's Title VII discrimination claim was untimely. [read post]