Search for: "Link v. District of Columbia" Results 1 - 20 of 855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 10:03 pm
Here is the abstract: This Article considers the future of originalism in the wake of the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:48 pm
Photo Album: District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia issued today in Hamdan v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:22 am
Here's a link to yesterday's United States District Court for the District of Columbia opinion rejecting eight servicemembers' legal challenge to the anthrax vaccine. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 6:04 pm
Eleven months after ruling that taxing damage awards for nonphysical compensatory damages violated the United States Constitution, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has reversed itself in Murphy v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 8:11 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, has gotten quite a bit of attention since it was filed last year because of its inside-the-Beltway context and the sordid nature of the facts. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
Among the cases up for consideration are District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 11:45 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:59 am
Click the following links below to read the amicus briefs filed yesterday in support of the petitioner in the upcoming case District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 1:00 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia at this link. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:02 am
And Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:26 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
District Court for the District of Columbia granted HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:01 pm by Orin Kerr
Holder, from Judge Kessler of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, who concludes the mandate is constitutional. [read post]