Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED April 14, 2015." Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 4:49 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
I will simply list those reasons due to the age of this case and that we are remanding it for further consideration. [read post]
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 3:32 pm by Eric Raphan and Brian DeShannon*
Beginning on April 14, 2015, the National Labor Relations Board’s (“NLRB” or the “Board”) new representation case procedural rules will be applied to all representation petitions filed thereafter. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
” At the time, none of the compounds McFadden was selling was listed as a federally prohibited “controlled substance. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
First Amendment Expansionism, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 56, No. 4, 2015, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2015-36. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
In 2013, EFF filed an inter partes review petition with the USPTO, challenging claims in patent US 8,112,504. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:29 pm by MOTP
On April 24, 2015, Forby filed a class action in Illinois state court that was later removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois on July 14, 2015. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 7:30 pm by The White Law Group
Trustee (together with the Debtors,) file a stipulation with respect to the Debtors’ compliance with the Interim Order. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am by Susan Hennessey
The parties have filed 234 exhibits and more than 110 declarations alleging facts and providing references to inform the Judge’s consideration of these issues. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In reply, the husband and R.L. each provided affidavits in further support of summary judgment dismissing the adultery counterclaim. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
 December 14, 2022Pendente lite child support award will not be disturbed absent exigent circumstances or failure to consider appropriate factors. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
Promega Corporation, No. 14-1538 (infringement under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am by MOTP
Second, the order granting summary judgment states the trial court's ruling was based on all of Lisa's responses and the documents on file with the court. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am by MBettman
Amos filed a motion to dismiss the 2015 indictment on the ground that he had no duty to register because the juvenile court had no authority to classify him after his juvenile disposition and parole had ended. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:18 pm by admin
Murphy could be fined $682,500 or more for the violations under federal law, and could be ordered to take actions to halt further violations. [read post]