Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED December 23, 2003"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm
SprinGuard then filed a petition to reinstate its Patent on the ground that the delay in paying the first maintenance fee, due in 2003, was “unavoidable. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
December 7, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:36 pm
The guardian ad litem has filed a report dated April 23, 2010 in which she states that she has no objections to the account as brought current and which she finds to be complete. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
Insurance -- Discovery -- Claim file -- Privilege -- Trial court erred in ordering production of documents from insurer's claim file in first-party dispute over medical bills without considering attorney-client privilege objection -- Trial court further erred in ruling that claim file notes and other internal documents were not protected by work product privilege, in failing to consider objections to relevancy of documents sought and in overruling… [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
December 14, 2022Pendente lite child support award will not be disturbed absent exigent circumstances or failure to consider appropriate factors. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 6:49 pm
(We note that FDA recently informed the PTO that the 180-day period for filing a due diligence petition for a determination of whether the PTE applicant acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period passed without the filing of such a petition.) [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal granted a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
The names, addresses andtelephone numbers of witnesses supporting the claims raised in this motion are furnished on awitness list which is being filed simultaneously with this motion. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
On April 2, 2003, Lynn filed a Petition to Modify Parent-Child Relationship and Request for Temporary Orders. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:14 pm
If the development manager does not offer the grievant a lease, he must submit the grievant's file to the District Office for further review. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm
Id.at 752.The Hospital filed a petition for review with this Court, raising three issues. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
According to a consent agreement and final order filed Feb. 23 in Kansas City, Kan., several violations of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) were noted during a February 2007 inspection of the UPS facility at 14650 West Santa Fe Trail Drive in Lenexa. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211, 215 (Tex. 2003). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm
Wimmer’s Meat Products CEO Dave Wimmer says the fines were for wastewater treatment violations his company is alleged to have committed between May 2003 and December 2006. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm
Wimmer’s Meat Products CEO Dave Wimmer says the fines were for wastewater treatment violations his company is alleged to have committed between May 2003 and December 2006. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
The Court ordered the USDA to conduct a rigorous assessment of the environmental and economic impacts of the crop on farmers and the environment. [read post]
