Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED February 14, 2012." Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 1:55 pm
And the Court denied review in the second case on December 8, 2014, by means of the same Order List containing an order directed to Shipley to show cause "why he should not be sanctioned for his conduct as a member of the Bar of this Court in connection with the petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 14-424. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
It further found that Family Court erred in vacating a December 2019 amended order of custody and dismissing both of petitioner’s Family Ct Act article 6 petitions. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
On February 1, 2012, it filed a second expert opinion by Prof. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Decisions of the Administrative Review Board February 2015 See Case summaries:   International Assoc. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, ARB No. 13-086 (ARB Feb. 27, 2015) Final Decision and Order PDF Summary: The ARB summarily affirmed the Principal Deputy Administrator’s determination that the Employer did not violation the Service Contract Act by refusing to promote workers employed as flight service specialists and pay a higher wage. [read post]
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
The Debtors Met Holdings filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on February 11, 2020, followed by the other Debtors on February 12, 2020. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
It further found that Family Court erred in vacating a December 2019 amended order of custody and dismissing both of petitioner’s Family Ct Act article 6 petitions. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
The husband denied all allegations of adulterous behavior in a reply dated February 1, 2019.The husband moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing that counterclaim under CPLR 3212. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am by Carolina Attorneys
Custody was later resolved through a consent order dated 23 February 2015. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 7:30 pm by The White Law Group
  February 14, 2022 – GWG Buys Time with Letter to Investors    Those investors who were hoping to see a February interest payment from GWG Holdings may be sorely disappointed today. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Austin filed two complaints: one elections complaint about his residency and a campaign finance complaint about the address McKean listed on his candidate affidavit. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, by consent order entered August 14, 2020, Supreme Court canceled the evidentiary hearing and directed respondent to furnish such responsive documents by September 14, 2020. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, by consent order entered August 14, 2020, Supreme Court canceled the evidentiary hearing and directed respondent to furnish such responsive documents by September 14, 2020. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Following CREED’s unsuccessful administrative appeals of the exemption determination and the permits, it filed a mandate petition in May 2012 alleging CEQA and other causes of action. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm by Kristyn Melvin and Matt Bonovich
The prior petition requested review of a limited number of Chinese companies while the current Petition requests review of all imports coming from Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia that use Chinese components. [read post]