Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 21, 2003"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2010, 7:55 pm
., January 21, 2010, Order)SprinGuard brought an action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) to seek judicial review of decisions of the Director of the PTO denying SprinGuard’s petitions to reinstate its Patent, which granted in 1999, but expired in 2003 for failing to pay a required maintenance fee.After the patent issued, the PTO mailed a letter in 2002 to SprinGuard’s attorney stating that the first… [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 6:53 pm
– EPA News Release, January 21, 2010 The United States today filed two major Clean Air Act settlements to reduce air emissions from container glass and Portland cement pla [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:52 pm
By order dated April 21, 2006, the court appointed a guardian ad litem to protect M's interests in this proceeding. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
November 30, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
After careful review, we vacate and remand the trial court’s order for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
State, 2005 OK CR 25, 124 P.3d 1198.On January 9, 2006, the State filed a Motion for Clarification of that opinion. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 11:58 am
The Petition relies upon a 2003 Commission TCPA order which states that “that any state regulation of interstate telemarketing calls that differs from our rules almost certainly would conflict with and frustrate the federal scheme and almost certainly would be preempted. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
I hope that further proceedings in the case fix the court’s pretty obvious error–but that fix won’t come from the California Supreme Court, which unfortunately denied the petition for review. 9) Musk destroys Twitter. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
In January 2011, the deputy sheriffs proposed a two day rodeo. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
The discrepancy pertained to a lump-sum loan/bonus payment of $350,000 that the husband received up front in January 2012. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
Originally on the list of those referred for prosecution in the commissions, Saifullah was eventually removed from that list and, like the vast majority of detainees, was left to seek release through either review boards at Gitmo or habeas corpus petitions filed in federal court. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
It is important to note that, since January 1, 2003, appellate courts have not had the option of issuing unpublished opinions. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
It is important to note that, since January 1, 2003, appellate courts have not had the option of issuing unpublished opinions. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Attached to Midland Funding's motion for new trial was the affidavit of Brian Staley, one of five attorneys listed as counsel for Midland Funding on its petition. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
Attached to Midland Funding's motion for new trial was the affidavit of Brian Staley, one of five attorneys listed as counsel for Midland Funding on its petition. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
