Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 29, 2013."
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
At its January 11, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as efforts by the Republican National Committee to terminate a consent decree, the interpretation of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, and the scope of the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:54 am
In response, the Respondent submitted declarations each declaring that the specimens attached to the Declaration of Use respectively on January 29, 2016, and on the February 3, 2020, were authentic. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:13 am
The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_04798.htm _____________________________ The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645-page e-book reviewing the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The Court of Appeal denied the County’s writ petition. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
In the letter, dated January 5, 2012, [Zahorik] informed Donoho that he filed an `Identity Theft/Fraud complaint’ with his local police department due to the recommendation of the FTC. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The trial court issued judgment granting the petition in June 2013. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The fee for petitions for review is to be reimbursed when the proceedings are re-opened before the BoA, even if further requests filed with the petition for review (here: replacement of members of the BoA) are unsuccessful, i.e. even if the requests of the petitioner are only partly successful. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
In 2013, EFF filed an inter partes review petition with the USPTO, challenging claims in patent US 8,112,504. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Francis of Assisi Anglican21-29. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
After careful review, we vacate and remand the trial court’s order for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
In January 2011, the deputy sheriffs proposed a two day rodeo. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
In October 2019, the mother filed a petition seeking custody of the child. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
In January 2011, the deputy sheriffs proposed a two day rodeo. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
" James's sons appeared and filed an answer generally denying the allegations in Harris County's petition. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
On January 25, 2013, at the first reading, the law was approved by 388 votes (with one vote against and one abstention). [18] On June 11, 2013, the State Duma approved the law at the second and third readings prohibiting “propaganda of non-traditional sexual relations among minors. [read post]
