Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED July 16, 2013."
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 1:55 pm
Dabney, a highly experienced patent appellate attorney who was then at Fried Frank, appeared as lead counsel for Teles AG on the brief for appellant, which was filed on July 16, 2012. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:20 am
Del. 2013). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Thus, the “Key Terms” listed in Mr. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
A public meeting to discuss the Administrative Draft is scheduled for July 17, 2013, in Sacramento. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
Since the FCC issued the order, trade associations and companies have filed multiple petitions for review in courts of appeals challenging the order (for example, see here and here). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 7:22 am
Since the FCC issued the order, trade associations and companies have filed multiple petitions for review in courts of appeals challenging the order (for example, see here and here). [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
In reply, the husband and R.L. each provided affidavits in further support of summary judgment dismissing the adultery counterclaim. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
That's particularly so because some readers might view this as influencing my general views on harassment restraining order cases, which I'll doubtless blog about more in the future; I should note, though, that I've been writing and litigating about these matters extensively long before this petition was filed against me (see, e.g., this 2013 article and this 2021 article, plus too many blog posts and briefs to list here). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
¶ 12, 16. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm
In July 2016, the wife commenced an action for divorce. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
Jan. 18, 2013)). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Vol. 2, No. 20, July 19, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
Further, the data analyzed by NFAP indicates that the stark increase in denials and delays is even greater for visa petition beneficiaries from India.[6] One of the results of this adjudicatory trend is a significant decrease in the number of L-1 visa petition filings with the USCIS Service Centers.[7] A review of recent RFEs and denials issued by the USCIS shows that the current theme in L-1 adjudications follows the following principles: Qualifying… [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal reversed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
