Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 21, 2013."
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
Kindly clarify Answer #1 An employer may withdraw the PERM petition at any time to file a new petition. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Supreme Court Order (10/31/11): The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
Further procedural violationsF. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
Further procedural violationsF. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The fee for petitions for review is to be reimbursed when the proceedings are re-opened before the BoA, even if further requests filed with the petition for review (here: replacement of members of the BoA) are unsuccessful, i.e. even if the requests of the petitioner are only partly successful. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
In a lengthy opinion filed February 22, and belatedly ordered published on March 25, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate challenging the EIR for a mixed use business and residential project (the “5M Project”) on 4 acres in downtown San Francisco. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
Thus, the “Key Terms” listed in Mr. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
That's particularly so because some readers might view this as influencing my general views on harassment restraining order cases, which I'll doubtless blog about more in the future; I should note, though, that I've been writing and litigating about these matters extensively long before this petition was filed against me (see, e.g., this 2013 article and this 2021 article, plus too many blog posts and briefs to list here). [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
I will simply list those reasons due to the age of this case and that we are remanding it for further consideration. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Along with their petitions, the Debtors filed the declaration of Robert D. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
Jan. 18, 2013)). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:38 pm
SHORT TITLE.This Act may be cited as the 'Civil Rights Act of 2013'. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
On July 22, 2011, Petitioners filed a timely petition for review of the DEA action. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:39 am
The Board granted the motion for a protective order, and it warned petitioner that further uncooperative or harassing behavior may result in the imposition of sanctions, and possibly entry of judgment. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
This is a petition for review of the case T 1676/11 where Board of appeal (BoA) 3.3.10 dismissed an appeal against the refusal of an application by the Examining Division (ED).I find the decision interesting because the Enlarged Board (EBA) had something to say on the role of the BoA in ex parte cases.Allowability of the petition for reviewThe first fundamental violation of A 113[2.1] The two aspects of this ground revolved, as became apparent during the oral proceedings… [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
Dawson, 2013-Ohio-4074 (2nd Dist.) [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:44 pm
” The children’s attorney filed a motion for review of the CINA petitions. [read post]
