Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 29, 2013."
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
At its January 11, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as efforts by the Republican National Committee to terminate a consent decree, the interpretation of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, and the scope of the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
City and County of San Francisco May 31, 2013, A135745) ___ Cal.App.4th ___. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
Further procedural violationsF. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
Further procedural violationsF. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
(Id. at PAGEID # 528-29.) [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 9:54 am
Maid-to-Order, Inc., 78 USPQ2d 1899, 1906 (TTAB 2006) (registration more than five years old may not be challenged on the ground that the mark was not used in commerce at the time of application filing). [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
In June 2013, petitioner sought to review her personnel file and discovered that all of her satisfactory written formal and informal observations from the 2010-11 and 2011-12 school years were missing. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The Court of Appeal denied the County’s writ petition. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
OFCCP, ARB No. 13-025A, ALJ No. 2013-OFC-1 (ARB Apr. 29, 2015) Order of Dismissal PDF Summary: Order approving unopposed motion to dismiss based on settlement. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
That's particularly so because some readers might view this as influencing my general views on harassment restraining order cases, which I'll doubtless blog about more in the future; I should note, though, that I've been writing and litigating about these matters extensively long before this petition was filed against me (see, e.g., this 2013 article and this 2021 article, plus too many blog posts and briefs to list here). [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
[Zahorik]'s letter further states: `The FTC has also instructed me to file this complaint with your office as well as the Attorney General's office for Identity Theft/Fraud as well as violating my right to privacy. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
Murray Energy and 98 of its affiliates (the “Murray Energy Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on October 29, 2019. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
Jan. 18, 2013)). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
In 2013, EFF filed an inter partes review petition with the USPTO, challenging claims in patent US 8,112,504. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The fee for petitions for review is to be reimbursed when the proceedings are re-opened before the BoA, even if further requests filed with the petition for review (here: replacement of members of the BoA) are unsuccessful, i.e. even if the requests of the petitioner are only partly successful. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
The trial court issued judgment granting the petition in June 2013. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:40 am
After careful review, we vacate and remand the trial court’s order for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
So, with no further ado, here is this year’s updated list of actual cases related to Halloween. [read post]
