Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED September 25, 2012." Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2014, 8:17 pm by Florian Mueller
But the anonymous requester(s) kept fighting for a more comprehensive review and filed a petition. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 7:52 pm by L. Gopika
Javed Akhtar has now filed a revision petition before the Calcutta High Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
To review our prior annual reviews, click here: 2012; 2011; 2010; 2009; 2008. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
On February 1, 2012, it filed a second expert opinion by Prof. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Stallman, J.), entered September 25, 2014, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denying the petition to annul a determination of respondents, dated December 6, 2013, which denied petitioner's appeal of an unsatisfactory performance rating (U-Rating) for the 2012-2013 school year, and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and the matter… [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:40 am by Phil Cave
At 0956 we see: Kali: Here’s the Chaidez case page: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/chaidez-v-united-states/ And of course Chaidez is listed as a grant in the orders list. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm by Joel R. Brandes
In reply, the husband and R.L. each provided affidavits in further support of summary judgment dismissing the adultery counterclaim. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The review was limited to the Trump, Obama, and George W. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Companion animals are not listed, nor provided in, the text of the Automatic Orders. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, by consent order entered August 14, 2020, Supreme Court canceled the evidentiary hearing and directed respondent to furnish such responsive documents by September 14, 2020. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Consequently, by consent order entered August 14, 2020, Supreme Court canceled the evidentiary hearing and directed respondent to furnish such responsive documents by September 14, 2020. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:39 am by Roel van Woudenberg
On 18 September 2014 the Receiving Section issued a communication informing the appellant that, in order to consolidate the proceedings concerning one single Euro-PCT application with two assigned European patent application numbers, proceedings would continue in respect of application No. 05 858 797.3 and that the communication of 11 December 2008 should be disregarded. [read post]