Search for: "List v. List"
Results 1 - 20
of 45,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2009, 4:15 am
The difference between a mandatory list and a non-mandatory listWall v Town of Niskayuna, USDC, N.D.N.Y. 1-29-2009, 07-CV-350, decided May 22, 2009One of the central issues in the Wall case* concerning the 2005 promotion of a police officer from Sergeant to Lieutenant was the allegation that the promotion was made from a civil service list that was invalid because it contained the names of only two candidates while three were needed to constitute a valid list.Making a… [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:13 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 4:25 pm
There were seven judgments handed down after full trials, only one of which concerned a claim against a mainstream media organisation: Dyson v MGN; Miller v Turner; Crobsie v Ley; Aaronson v Stones; LCG v OVD; Bekoe v Islington; Packham v Wightman and Hay v Cresswell. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:11 pm
Wong v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:57 pm
Today the RIAA filed a new witness list and a new amended exhibit list in Capitol Records v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 9:05 am
Other orders lists will be issued later in the summer. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:32 am
Restoration to eligible list a matter of discretionLee v Director of Personnel [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] Does a person who is discharged for failure to satisfactorily complete the required probationary period have a right to be restored to the eligible list? [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:38 am
There are a few updates in Indiana’s first keyword advertising case, Angie’s List v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:50 am
The difference between a mandatory list and a non-mandatory listWall v Town of Niskayuna, USDC, N.D.N.Y. 1-29-2009, 07-CV-350One of the central issues in the Wall case* concerning the 2005 promotion of a police officer from Sergeant to Lieutenant was the allegation that the promotion was made from a civil service list that was invalid because it contained the names of only two candidates while [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:24 pm
Rehearing was denied in several cases, including Berghuis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
"The Pena court, citing City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768, said that only if Pena’s challenge to the list itself was successful would she have a remedy that comports with Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution, in that the original list would have had no legal existence and thus could not have expired, allowing for extension of a 'corrected' list. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:00 am
See Nieves v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:07 pm
The Supreme Court on Friday released the list of counsel appearing for oral argument in the session that begins next Monday. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 4:43 pm
Here are three more items from the Honolulu media about the case in which the Star-Advertiser is seeking the Judicial Selection Commission lists from the Governor (Star-Advertiser v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 3:00 pm
For all of you Manafort trial junkies, here is the Government Exhibit List, recently filed in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:19 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
Here is a complete list to the SCOTUSBlog On-Line Symposium on United States v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:52 pm
Using data pulled from the TSDB, TSA runs three different, related lists: the No Fly List, the Selectee List and the Expanded Selectee List. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:00 pm
ThomasOregon: 07-934 Andersen v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
