Search for: "Little v. O'Malley" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 12:45 pm
September 15, 2011) (before Rader, Chief Judge, Lourie and O'Malley, Circuit Judges) (opinion by Chief Judge Rader). [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge O'Malley filed a concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part opinion.The majority opinion was written by Chief Judge Rader. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 12:49 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Kathleen O'Malley, of the Federal Circuit (sitting by designation) dissented. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
  This inquiry was posed to my colleague, Joel O'Malley, who works out of our Minneapolis office but who is licensed in both Minnesota and California. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 10:00 pm
In the fourth and last dissent, Judge O'Malley states that the Federal Circuit has applied the Mayo Supreme Court decision too broadly. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm by Justin E. Gray
Judge O'Malley wrote, in part: Post-Markman, district judges have been trained to--and do--engage in detailed and thoughtful analysis of the claim construction issues presented to them. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
  Legal Reasoning (LOURIE, O'Malley, Chen)BackgroundRepresentative Claim LanguageClaim 29 of the ’128 patent is representative and reads as follows:29. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:28 am by KC Johnson
Francis arose when the former Baltimore police commissioner, Kevin Clark, sued the city of Baltimore and former Baltimore mayor Martin OMalley after OMalley fired the commissioner. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 1:28 pm
Mylan (CAFC 2011-1611) nonprecedential (translation: "don't quote us on this business-as-usual correction") Judge Rader (CAFC slick fixer #1), Dyk, and O'Malley (author) This is a Hatch-Waxman Act case. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm by Florian Mueller
In response to (among others) those briefs, Oracle issued a comment last year regarding collective amnesia about Android not being Java-compatible.The only gradual change from last year's amicus briefs is that they are now talking a little bit more about why they believe it's not acceptable to relegate, as Federal Circuit Judge O'Malley proposed, interoperability questions to the fair use stage of the analysis. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:24 am by Susan Brenner
The website solicited feedback in the following format: Contact Governor O'Malley We'd like to hear from you. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
Although the matter is not necessarily over by any means, a recent Court of Appeals decision might have struck the final blow, and ended the matter (and the question of APIs and copyright) for the time being.The case of Oracle America Inc. v Google LLC concerned the Java software platform, which was developed by Oracle's predecessor, Sun Microsystems. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
Although the matter is not necessarily over by any means, a recent Court of Appeals decision might have struck the final blow, and ended the matter (and the question of APIs and copyright) for the time being.The case of Oracle America Inc. v Google LLC concerned the Java software platform, which was developed by Oracle's predecessor, Sun Microsystems. [read post]