Search for: "Lochner v. New York" Results 161 - 180 of 323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 Randy Barnett and many others hate his Lochner dissent, which, of course, basically licensed untrammeled majority rule even if arguably "tyrannical. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 3:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Here is an excerpt: In 1885, Lee Yick—better known as Yick Wo—was fined $10 for operating a wooden laundry in San Francisco without a permit.[1] Joseph Lochner was "sentenced to pay a fine of $50" for violating the New York Bakeshop Act.[2] The Oregon law limiting the number of hours women could work, which Curt Muller violated, authorized "a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $25. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
There are plenty of advantages to practicing business divorce litigation in New York. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:14 pm
New York, and Korematsu v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:29 am by David Bernstein
New York (with shout out to Rehabilitating Lochner, thanks!) [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 11:55 am by Ilya Somin
New York (1905), which held that the Due Process Clause protects freedom of contract and forbids maximum hours laws for bakers. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:18 am
New York (1905), Abrams v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
A recent column in the New York Times entitled “Defying the Supreme Court,” by noted and Pulitzer-prize winning journalist David Leonhardt, exemplifies the problem. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 2:01 pm by Andrew Koppelman
New York, in which the Court invented a right of employers to be free from maximum hours laws. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am by Adam Gillette
Justice Peckham is probably better remembered as the author of the opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
Schneiderman, in which the court ruled that a New York’s credit-card surcharge ban regulates speech, suggesting that the case “portends a vehicle to challenge any law as abridging free-speech rights” and wondering whether “Schneiderman [is] the new Lochner. [read post]