Search for: "Locke Manufacturing Companies v. United States"
Results 81 - 100
of 139
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
– EPA News Release, July 14, 2010 A Wichita, Kan., aircraft component company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $132,500 to the United States to settle a series of alleged violations of federal hazardous waste management regulations at its manufacturing facility. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
(June 14, 1991) (presented by plaintiffs’ counsel Jim Pettit, of Greitzer & Locks), in Radcliff v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
(IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Campaign against America Invents Act intensifies (Inventive Step) Will you be crushed like a bug? [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:40 am
Seemingly, gone were the days of state “fictitious group” insurance laws prohibiting the grouping of individuals or entities for the purposes of buying insurance, replaced by a federal framework intended to provide consistent, economical and affordable coverage to commercial liability insureds across the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:54 pm
There've been a raft of good decisions, although none from the United States Supreme Court, for all us practitioners on the right (in more ways than one) side of the “v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
The brief was on behalf of Professors of Second Amendment Law (including VC's Randy Barnett), Cato Institute, John Locke Foundation, Center to Keep and Bear Arms (Mountain States Legal Foundation), and Independence Institute. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
She came to this country as a teenage refugee from Vietnam and later served in the United States Army. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
’: (IP finance), Allied Security Trust – High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright On distinguishing between creative commons, the public domain, and all rights reserved – confusion in mainstream media: (creativecommons.org), Inside views: a new business model for the music industry explained: (Intellectual Property Watch),… [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 8:35 am
United States Cellular Corporation (N.D. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
