Search for: "Locke v. Mitchell"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 8:24 am
A few expert witnesses, eager to avoid being locked in as either a “plaintiff’s” or a “defendant’s” expert witness, with perhaps some damage to their professional reputations, balanced their views in a way to avoid being classified as working exclusively for one side or the other. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:37 am
On April 26, the Kentucky Supreme Court reversed summary judgment in favor of an employer that fired an employee for keeping a gun in his car (Mitchell v University of Kentucky). [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:35 pm
Mitchell L. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
and without rent being owed, had entered the property and changed the locks. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
and without rent being owed, had entered the property and changed the locks. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:15 am
HHJ Mitchell quashed that decision, finding that Reg 6(2) operates when a person is no longer working, ie if the illness happens after the applicant lost his job and even if the illness was unrelated to his work; and that he was bound by the decision in FB v Secretary of State for Work [2010] UKUT 447 (IAC) to find that temporary in para (a) meant not permanent. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
Recently, Froomkin gave a public address as part of his installation as the Laurie Silvers and Mitchell Rubenstein Endowed Distinguished Professorship, a rotating chair he'll hold for a three year period. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:18 pm
Mitchell, supra. 3See, e.g., State v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 6:05 am
Oceanic Contractors, Inc., 458 U.S. 564, 575 (1982)); Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:16 am
Donaldson actually filed this most recent complaint back in May, but no summons issued until late August, and now Baldwin's counsel, Laura Mitchell Friedmann (from Fredrikson & Byron ("the other F&B")) has moved for a flotilla of pro hac vice motions for Chicago-based Kirkland & Ellis lawyers. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:31 am
Mitchell, 63 Ill. 553 (1872). [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 64 (D.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
" See, Mitchel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
The court concluded, however, that the state had not shown that a total ban on smudging ceremonies is the least restrictive means of furthering the compelling interest in safety and security.In Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
January 9, 2009 PRELIMINARY MEMORANDUM OF THE JUSTICE ROBERT H. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 10:04 am
Those concerns, however, did not pose an immediate threat to defendant and thus do not fall within the purview of the emergency exception to the warrant requirement (see generally People v Molnar, 98 NY2d 328, 332; People v Mitchell, 39 NY2d 173, 177-178, cert denied 426 U.S. 953). [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Some data: 27 Democratic Gains AZ-05 Harry Mitchell v. [read post]
