Search for: "Lockwood v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2016, 8:33 am by Daily Record Staff
On appeal, Lockwood presents three questions for our ... [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 9:30 am by azatty
This month, we commemorate the achievements of Arizona women as we look forward to the next generation of female leaders in our state. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am by Don Cruse
Workers compensation death benefits STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:37 am by Dennis Crouch
Roche Molecular Sys., Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2188 (2011) (citing United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Bingham of Ohio and the Historical Context of the Fourteenth Amendment" Cynthia Nicoletti (Assistant Professor of Law, Mississippi College School of Law) "The Disputed Constitutionality of the Emancipation Proclamation"11:00-12:30 | Panel TwoStephen Mihm (University of Georgia), chairPaul Kens (Professor of Political Science, Texas State University at San Marcos) "Big Business and the Reconstruction Amendments: Lessons from Munn v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 6:08 am
If the Legislature intended this result, the Act, the Regulation, the TSSA Guideline or CSA Standard would have stated that utility companies must ensure that the pipes “remain” buried at a minimum depth.Unlike the case of Sun-Canadian Pipeline v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:10 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  Habeas is denied if the state appellate court's deferential review of the trial court is at least reasonable.Briggs v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 4:16 am by Marie Louise
First Quality Baby Products (Patently-O) Supreme Court denies sham patent reexamination dispute: Lockwood v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
High Court Denies Inventors Plea to Punish Law Firm Perhaps surprising no one but the petitioner, the strange case of Lockwood v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Twelve Foreign Performing SocietiesAmicus brief of Broadcast Music, Inc.Amicus brief of Independent Music Publishers et al.Amicus brief of Ralph OmanPetitioner's reply Title: Lockwood v. [read post]