Search for: "London v. Manhattan Life Corp"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2011, 11:57 am
Colonel Dan Mori, a JAG Corps attorney who has seen service in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and who has represented a Gitmo detainee. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South Africa): (Afro-IP), 15-16 September: US ACI 10th advanced forum on biotech patents… [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Irving Selecoff arrived in New York, from Liverpool, London, on the S.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Dep’t of Justice, Manhattan U.S. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Selikoff arrived in New York, from Liverpool, London, on the S.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
,INTA roundtable on ‘Internet domain names: A trademark practitioner’s point of view’ - Manhattan, 14 April: (The Trademark Blog),INTA trade mark conference, Sydney: OHIM President offers to host roundtable to cut red tape facing businesses attempting to obtain worldwide IP protection: (IPwar’s)Domain tasting: why are IP owners silent? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
