Search for: "Lones v. Lones" Results 101 - 120 of 1,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The law does not apply to small businesses (as defined by the Small Business Administration) and along with several categories of personal data that are excluded from coverage under the law, the following entities are specifically exempted: State agencies or political subdivisions; Financial institutions subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act; Covered entities or business associates governed by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); Non-profit… [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 5:17 pm
Over two years after the Supreme Court's decision in MGM v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 1:09 pm
In the last batch of Virginia Supreme Court opinions, in Almy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 7:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Court's lone opinion has to do with which branch of government gets to decide whether Jerusalem is in Israel.The Court took up for full briefing and argument next term the case of Luis v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 10:00 am
In Condor Funding, LLC v Miles, Condor alleged that Ginger Miles had illegally sublet her rent-stabilized apartment in order to pursue a teaching assignment in the Lone Star State.Although the tenant had formally requested the landlord's written approval of the arrangement by complying with the requirements of New York's "sublet law,"* Condor refused to consent to the transfer, citing a suspicion that the tenant was permanently relocating to… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 12:00 am
Drug Classifications in Texas The Lone Star state classifies drugs according to their potential for abuse and if the substance serves a medical purpose. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Federalism: Thoughts on Erie at Eighty, forthcoming in the Akron Law Review:Justice Brandeis is, in intellectual property law’s precincts, most famous for his lone dissent in International News Service v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Id. at1235 (citing Lexmark Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]