Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 121 - 140
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2012, 10:33 am
Arnold v Britton [2012] EWHC 2451(Ch) is the third holiday chalet / service charge case we’ve covered in short order (the other two are here and here). [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am
Following a long line of authority including Nikken v Pioneer [2005] and Nokia v IPCom [2011], Floyd LJ held that it was necessary to distinguish between pre-trial applications to amend and post-trial deletions on the one hand, and post-trial validating amendments by re-writing the claims on the other. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
The (alleged) hoity-toity backgrounds of the justices—underscored in a January 22, 2015 Washington Post piece—came into laser focus in oral arguments in Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can I be arrested without evidence against me? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am
Phonographic Performance Limited v Fletcher is an extempore ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last Monday; being extempore it isn't available on BAILII but it was noted in brief on the subscription-only Lawtel service. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:25 am
Other participating firms in addition to Dechert (Joe Hetrick's the conference co-chair): Reed Smith, Arnold & Porter, King & Spalding, and Pepper Hamilton for our side and Cohen, Placitella, Raynes McCarty, and Seeger Weiss representing the other side of the "v".For a complete list of the pairings and the topics see the conference brochure. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
Littebrant, 55 AD3d 1151, 1154, [2008] [juror with professional and long-term personal relationship with key defense witness properly excused for cause]; People v Bedard, 132 AD3d 1070 [3d Dept 2015] [friendship with District Attorney required granting of a for cause challenge]; People v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
” The Judge had concluded that this fell within the meaning of the term “deactivated” in the claim as it was considered unnecessary for the pump to be switched off so long as it was “rendered sufficiently less active that no more fluid is pumped into the canister. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 8:08 am
Arnold Wadsworth & Coggins offers a free consultation. [read post]
31 May 2017, 8:28 am
The Court of Appeal judgment refers back to Regeneron v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
” Similarly, in Arnold v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
Pepper Bottling Co. of Texas, Inc., 416 F.Supp.2d 497, 504 (N.D.Tex. 2006); Arnold D. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:05 am
The AmeriKat working off her impatience while awaitingthis morning's Article 3(a) OpinionThis morning Advocate General Wathelet handed down his opinion in the reference from Mr Justice Arnold in Teva v Gilead (Case C-121/17) concerning Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:42 pm
Logical deductions could be made as long as they were not mere supposition. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:26 am
A search by customs officers at an American airport, does not require reasonable suspicion, according to the Ninth Circuit in USA v Arnold. (4/21/2008). [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
The new cases are Arnold v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
Posted by Matt Wadsworth, partner at Arnold & Wadsworth, serving the areas of Salt Lake City, Ogden, Farmington, Kaysville, Layton, Draper. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In the case of R 5/14 the Petitioner had a long list of complaints against a Board of Appeal, but no real chance of success. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:18 am
The case is a vast one, of positively Arnoldian proportions -- which is no surprise when you consider that the judge is indeed Mr Justice Arnold and the case is Stichting BDO and others v BDO Unibank, Inc and others [2013] EWHC 418 (Ch), fresh from the Chancery Division, England and Wales, today. [read post]
