Search for: "Long v. Arnold" Results 161 - 180 of 598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 4:42 am
 One such case is Omega Engineering Incorporated v Omega S.A. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
In Case Nintendo v PC Box C-355/12 [Kat Posts here], the CJEU explained that Art 6 is to be interpreted broadly and "includes application of an access control or protection process, such as encryption, scrambling or other transformation of the work". [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Starting on January 9th, the parties pleaded their case revolving around the decade-long legal battle between Bouvier and Rybolovlev, and Sotheby’s alleged involvement. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:23 am
 Tobias is also letting us have a copy of an English translation of Kecofa v Lancôme. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Mary Ziegler on the Texas, the Supreme Court and Roe v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
Vestergaard Fransen S/A & others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others is a case that simply refuses to go away. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:55 am
If last year’s Supreme Court case in Actavis v Eli Lilly is to be taken as a guide, the Court may take around three months to make its judgment available. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:15 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Arnold Friedman and his son Jesse gave computer classes at their home on Long Island. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:27 pm by AALRR
 Now that the court is once again fully-staffed with seven members, it remains to be seen when the court will schedule for oral argument and ultimately decide the long pending decision in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:25 am by Brian Cordery
However, in the case of American Science & Engineering Inc. v Rapiscan Systems Limited [2016] EWHC 756 (Pat), handed down on 11 April 2016, both sides appear to have at least tried to follow the guidance set out by Arnold J in Medimmune Limited v Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited [2011] EWHC 1669 (Pat). [read post]