Search for: "Lord v. Murphy" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2016, 3:17 am by Ben
 http://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/murphys-law-of-licensing.htmlhttp://the1709blog.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/copyright-vs-competition-law-new-dawn.htmlFootball Association Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure; Karen Murphy v Media Protection Service Ltd [C-403/08 and C-429/08] [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[From the website of the University of Cambridge Faculty of Law.]This term the Centre for English Legal History will be hosting four seminars:27 January - David Waddilove (St Catherine’s College, Cambridge) on ‘The legal basics of early-modern lending’10 February - David Ibbetson (University of Cambridge) on ‘Words and deeds: the action of covenant, again’24 February - Nicola Murphy (National University of Ireland, Galway) on ‘Derry v Peek in the… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
Although Gandy v Jubber was settled before the judgment was pronounced it has been treated as good authority in subsequent cases, including by the House of Lords in Monk. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
The judgment, which was delivered by Lord Justice Etherton (with whom Lord Justice Munby and Lord Justice Lewison agreed) followed an appeal from part of an order on 3 February last of Lord Justice Kitchin (noted by the IPKat here) and, prior to that, the controversial 2011 judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd and Others v QC Leisure and… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by INFORRM
Ireland 10 July 2003, No. 44179/99 (“Murphy”); and  TV Vest AS and Rogaland Pensjonistparti v Norway. 11 December 2008. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:47 pm
Superior Court (Kimco) (2007) 157 Cal.App.4th 225 (review denied), the  Third Division  disregarded a discussion in Murphy v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
On 20 July 2012 there will be an application in the case of Lord Ashcroft v Foley. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:00 am by Adam Wagner
The judgment in this still has not been released. 14 July | Law Review: Lord Judge LCJ on the State of The Nation – an important speech: Charon QC summarises Lord Judge’s speech. [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
Compatriot Holdings Ltd Co & Anor v Chairwoman of London Rent Assessment Committee & Ors [2009] EWHC 3312 (Admin) Following on from the post by NL in Ahmed & Ors v Murphy it has been a busy time for the High Court and the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC). [read post]
13 May 2010, 3:26 am by David Smith
Compatriot Holdings Ltd Co & Anor v Chairwoman of London Rent Assessment Committee & Ors [2009] EWHC 3312 (Admin) Following on from the post by NL in Ahmed & Ors v Murphy it has been a busy time for the High Court and the London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC). [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 11:59 pm
Having already dealt with one situation earlier in the decade (VGT v Switzerland, 2001), finding that a Swiss ban was a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression), and returned to a related matter in the Murphy v Ireland case mentioned on these pages last week, upholding an Irish ban on religious advertising, the case decided today involved a Norwegian political party’s attempt to advertise on TV, despite a statutory ban on such advertisements. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Cian Murphy
The case of M & Others v HM Treasury has recently been before the Court of Justice on a reference from the House of Lords. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:25 am by Sophie Corke
Murphy, Austrian Supreme Court revisits football screening in pubs | Dutch State not liable for incorrect interpretation of private copying exception, says Hague Court of Appeal | West African Cotton Company Limited v Hozelock Exel: How may a petitioner establish lack of novelty of a registered design in Nigeria? [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
”, Murphy J ignored the 2010 Act entirely, began his analysis with Bonnard v Perryman, discussed subsequent authorities, and declined to award the injunction. [read post]