Search for: "Louisiana State v. Department of Commerce et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 4:25 am
The patent was examined by the USPTO, a branch of the Department of Commerce. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
Wayfair, et al., __ U.S. __ (2018) decision, the Court expressly overruled Quill (and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
The petition was Anderson, et al., v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 09-54 Title: Department of the Interior et al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Docket: 08-1291 Title: Tucker, et al. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:13 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
§ Petition for certiorari § Brief in opposition to petition for certiorari § Amicus brief of Louisiana et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:28 pm
Commerce Department, and U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:39 am
§ Amicus brief of International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention et al. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Pappas et al. find that counterfeit cigarettes can have as much as seven times the lead of authentic brands, and close to three times as much thallium, a toxic heavy metal.[14] Other sources report finding insect eggs, dead flies, mold, and human feces in counterfeit cigarettes.[15] During prohibition of alcohol in the United States during the 1920s, increased enforcement did not manage to significantly decrease the prevalence of bootlegging because the profit margins… [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Harvey et al.Amicus brief of Gerald Sherwin et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Evanson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
AbramsonAmicus brief for Oregon Criminal-Law and Criminal-Procedure ProfessorsAmicus brief for the Federal Public Defender of the District of OregonAmicus brief for Professor Kate StithAmicus brief for the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
SteenDocket: 10-671Issue(s): Whether the Twenty-first Amendment overrides the Commerce Clause and allows States to discriminate against out-of-state businesses in the sale of a [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
JacksonDocket: 10-735Issue(s): Whether the Due Process Clause prevents state courts from employing the class-action device to eliminate fundamental substantive and procedural protections that would otherwise apply to adjudications of class members' individual claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
The outcome of this case could have a significant impact on his strategy going forward. [1] The states are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. [2] Texas, et al. v. [read post]
