Search for: "Lovel v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d 147, 149 [1st Dept 1998].) [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:47 pm by Christine Wilton
An example would be whether tithing is a reasonable expense is a question of fact (In re Lovell, No. 10-02702; Lovell v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:07 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:28 am
Panelists include: Taunya Lovell Banks, The University of Maryland Felice J. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Allegations Allegations of  overbilling, padding of costs, and billing for unnecessary legal services can constitute a cause of action for breach of contract, provided the allegations do not directly challenge the quality of the attorney’s work (Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415,416 [1st Dept 2014]; O’Connor v Blodnick, Abramowitz and Blodnick, 295 AD2d 586,587 [2d Dept 2002] [same]). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 2:56 am
The judges state that the library user may rely on Sec. 53 UrhG when using the library terminal. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 8:20 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Mark Brennan and Arpan Sura
On June 20, 2019, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in PDR v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The Herald has also used the case to analyse the state of Australia as a jurisdiction for defamation litigation. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:02 pm
Daniel Brooks of Hogan Lovells, Werit’s solicitors, introduced the case. [read post]