Search for: "Lucas v. District Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York's decision in Fabergé Ltd. et al.v Yusufov et al., 1:14-cv-03519. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Byrnes, The Supreme Court [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog) [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am
The District Court dismissed the case for lack of standing, and the Appeals Court affirmed. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:57 pm
Lucas Cnty. [read post]
29 May 2020, 5:02 am
From Craft v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 6:27 am
”) Celestino v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:46 pm
This post examines a recent decision from the Court of Appeals of Ohio – Ninth District: State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:25 pm
District Court in Massachusetts (Mexico v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:25 pm
District Court in Massachusetts (Mexico v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:22 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Rosenberg v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
District Court for the Northern District of New York analyzed the lawyer advertising and solicitation rules adopted by the Appellate Division of Supreme Court effective February 1, 2007. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Even though the court struck the plaintiffs’ allegations regarding class certification requirements, it found it was premature to rule out class certification and allowed the plaintiffs to once again amend their complaint (Lucas v Vee Pak, Inc, September 17, 2014, Tharp, J). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
New York City and Lucas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:21 pm
Chatlynne, Stephen Kenny and Lucas Watkins decided to test this assertion by looking at validity challenges from two data sets: cases from 1966-1982 (the "Graham v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 3:19 pm
Attorney for the Central District of California. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
” Justice Norman Epstein of the Second District Court of Appeal called him “the Justinian of California. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
Lucas No. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:43 pm
Supreme Court recently explained the nature of facial challenges:Under United States v. [read post]
