Search for: "M/V Gulf Influence"
Results 21 - 34
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 3:04 pm
Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
“All the Gulf states are meeting. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
In the first four parts of our series on the California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am
Buoyed by the military’s obvious competence in the First Gulf War, the public increasingly turned to it for solutions to the country’s problems. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
In its ruling in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 7:41 am
In Texas v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am
Assn. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Following on the heels of Monday’s announcement that Anthem, Inc. is paying a record setting $16 million to resolve charges its violations of the enterprise risk assessment and other requirements of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule allowed cybercriminals to breach the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of more than 79 million patients, physicians and other health care providers, health plans and health insurers, health care… [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
In finding its application of Kravis proper, the Board found that the Respondent could not have relied on the due process standard overruled by Kravis as well settled when it withdrew recognition of the union, because the Supreme Court's earlier decision in NLRB v. [read post]
