Search for: "MAIN v. STAHL"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2005, 2:19 am
Stahl, and Judge Sandra L. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 2:13 pm
This was established in Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] EWCA Civ 3 and confirmed in Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl G.m.b.h. [1983] 2 AC 34 (both cases involving telexes). [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
App. 1985); Stahl v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Stahl v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
The main count, of course, will be the learned intermediary rule itself, but we’ll also add, because we have the data available, whether the state has: (1) applied the learned intermediary rule in medical device cases, and (2) applied the rule to protect pharmacists from direct-to-consumer warning claims.Here goes:There are, by our count, thirty-four states and the District of Columbia, in which the learned intermediary rule has been adopted either by the jurisdiction’s… [read post]
24 Sep 2022, 8:03 am
., LLC v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
