Search for: "MARKS v. UNITED"
Results 41 - 60
of 10,976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2013, 6:59 am
Cabell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
Yesterday, the United States of America filed a motion to intervene and for reconsideration in the Unique Product Solutions v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
After all, the government splits any award obtained with the relator.It appears, however, that the United States is finally acknowledging publicly that the trend of suits under 35 USC 292 has gone too far, given the rash of thinly pled false marking claims that have come to dominate the landscape since the Federal Circuit’s decision in Forest Group v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 8:32 am
So was Bush v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:42 am
United States”: At the “Balkinization” blog, Richard Primus has a post that begins, “An earlier post on this blog by Mark Tushnet explained that Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in Gundy v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 8:27 am
Tomorrow will mark the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:11 am
Williams, Questions Marks: Plurality Decisions and Precedential Constraint, which discusses lower courts' misuse of Marks v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:21 am
Fiat Group Automobiles S.p.A. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 12:27 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Hungarian Intellectual Property Office (HIPO) found that Unilever had sold large quantities of and publicised the goods designated by its Community word mark IMPULSE in the United Kingdom and Italy, with that mark enjoying a 5% market share in the United Kingdom and a 0.2% market share in Italy [the product seems to be some sort of perfumed and/or deodorant body spray]. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 11:10 am
Download this Insight (PDF) Access the code and data (GitHub repository) Introduction The majority decision in Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
This means that the maximum potential liability for 1000 units falsely marked is $500,000. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:28 pm
And at "PrawfsBlawg," Re has a related post titled "The Marks Rule and Hughes v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
” Chiarella v. [read post]
