Search for: "MATTER OF B B B B B B" Results 1 - 20 of 40,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Matter of B. v J. 2018, NY Slip Op. 02148 L.B., Petitioner, Respondent. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:48 am
The case of B v B [2012] EWHC 1924 (Fam), decided today, contains another judicial warning upon the preparation of court bundles. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Matter of B. v J. 2018, NY Slip Op. 02148 L.B., Petitioner, Respondent. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  It would be completely unfair to, say, a §33(b) remote good faith user to say that the registration relates back to the initiation of the case, when a key point of registration is to fix the date on which rights became nationwide as a matter of law.But, for the very same reason, the result should be different here: registration provides statutoryrights that are explicitly provided over and above the common law, and it was those things—nationwide priority, the very… [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 1:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
B&B’s predicate to its defense, that “finality” was what mattered, is thus fatally flawed. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:47 am by Jonathan Bailey
A cursory plagiarism check likely would have spotted these issues and put the matter to rest before it was ever published. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 6:18 am
I couldn't help but notice that there were two cases both named In the matter of B (Children) reported on Family Law Week this week. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Jonathan Spencer
His practice encompasses the defense of civil matters including employment claims such as those brought under the […] The post Harvey Kruse Names David B. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In a separate opinion in B-K Lighting, Judge Newman writes:On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted the motion of Fresno Valves & Castings (“FVC”), and ruled that United States Patent RE 39,084, owned by B-K Lighting, is invalid on the ground of obviousness. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:54 am by scanner1
-B., JESSICA JEANNE JOHNSON, fka JESSICA JEANNE LAWRENCE, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Advocates of unlimited access to Plan B in all its forms argue that proof-of-age or other retail restrictions on sales would mean that many poor women and younger girls would be denied access as a practical matter. [read post]
6 May 2013, 11:27 am by Lyle Denniston
That is where matters stood when Judge Korman returned to the issue in a ruling on April 5. [read post]
28 Sep 2005, 11:42 am
Under BARF 707(b)(2), the judge, trustee or creditor can all bring a 707(b) motion to dismiss if the debtor's household has more than the median income for a household of that size. [read post]