Search for: "MATTER OF GRAHAM v. Coughlin"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Further, in Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014, the Court of Appeals upheld the removal of a state correction officer following his conviction of a felony under federal law. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 10:41 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
This remains true even in the event that the parties have consented to the requested fee akin to Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Phelan. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:30 pm
These include: the time spent (Matter of Kelly); the complexity of the questions involved (Matter of Coughlin); the nature of the services provided (Matter of Von Hole); the amount of litigation required (Matter of Sabatino); the amounts involved and the benefit resulting from the execution of such services (Matter of Shalman); the lawyer's experience and reputation (Matter of Brehm); and the customary fee charged by the Bar for similar… [read post]
