Search for: "MATTER OF R B" Results 1 - 20 of 14,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm by Matthew Kolken
Matter of E-R-M- & L-R-M-, 25 I&N Dec. 520 (BIA 2011) (1) Section 235(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:03 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
When the BIA issued Matter of M-R-M-S- on Dec. 1, 2023 advocates were troubled. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by FM Librarian
Matter of A-B- Analysis & Commentary:See this earlier blog post for background on the Attorney General's decision in Matter of A-B-. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 5:00 am by eileen peck
Photo Credit: Chris Potter, via Flickr.com The post Domestic Violence Charge is False, R & B Singer Claims appeared first on Robert M. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:49 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Matter of J-G-R- (1) Torturous conduct committed by a public official who is “acting in an official capacity,” meaning acting under color of law, is covered by the regulations implementing the Convention Against Torture, but such conduct by an official who is not acting in an official capacity is not covered. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 8:24 am by Legal Profession Prof
Harris, is charged with violating Rules 1.4(b) (failure to explain a matter to a client), 1.5(a) (charging an unreasonable fee), 1.15(a) (failure to maintain records;... [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:33 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Matter of M-R-M-S-, 28 I&N Dec. 757 (BIA 2023) - If a persecutor is targeting members of a certain family as a means of achieving some other ultimate goal unrelated to the protected ground, family membership is incidental or subordinate to that other ultimate goal and therefore not one central reason for the harm. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 9:49 am
The GAO published a decision today in the Matter of SunEdison, LLC, B-298583; B-298583.2, dated October 30, 2006, involving SunEdison’s protest of an award to PowerLight Corporation under request for proposals (RFP) No. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 12:06 pm by PaulKostro
., A-2669-08T2, October 4, 2010: Although nonrefundable retainers are specifically prohibited in Family Court matters, R. 5:3-5(b), there is no such prohibition in other case types. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:10 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0137, 2010 MT 240N, LINDA B. [read post]