Search for: "MATTER OF R T" Results 1 - 20 of 53,796
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2012, 9:37 am by Dharmendra Chatur
Senior Advocate of the SCI, T R Adhyarujina has recently written (an abridged form of his speech at the Bombay High Court) in the Hindu about the disturbing trends in judicial activism by the Supreme Court of India. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:37 am by Dharmendra Chatur
Senior Advocate of the SCI, T R Adhyarujina has recently written (an abridged form of his speech at the Bombay High Court) in the Hindu about the disturbing trends in judicial activism by the Supreme Court of India. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:44 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0636, 2011 MT 164, IN THE MATTER OF: R.M.T., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:49 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0019, 2012 MT 148N, IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF : R.T., A Minor. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:08 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0098, 2012 MT 188N, IN THE MATTER OF: T.R. 1 and T.R. 2, Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The question arises as to whether the behaviour of the ED in the proceedings up to refusal deprived the applicant of the right to be heard (A 113(1)), and whether the decision was sufficiently reasoned (R 68(2)). [4.3] Decision T 939/92 referred to by the appellant in the statement of grounds of appeal (followed for instance in T 1242/04 [9.2]) sets out that A 54(2) does not limit the state of the art to written disclosure in specific documents. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Reasoning as in T 708/00, an objection under R 137(5) should not have been made. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 5:26 am by Neal Fortin
Just will present a lecture, "Food, Policy and Behavioral Economics: Why Choice Matters and Why it Doesn’t," 6:00 pm Monday, September 29, 2014, at  the the University Club of Michigan State University.David R. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In decision T 604/01, the board held that objections under A 123(2) and (3) which the opponent raised during the opposition proceedings but did not further explain until OPs could not be excluded under R 71a(1) EPC 1973 because these objections were a matter of argument. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:49 am by Derek Black
State of New York -- the "Small Cities" case -- the State brought on Eric Hanushek and David Armor to mount the time-worn, discredited "money doesn't matter" defense. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 11:04 am
No, it is a matter of the individual, opportunity and the belief that they won't be caught that leads to corruption. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thereby, said statement gave detailed reasons why the decision under appeal should be set aside and indicated the facts and evidence in support of the respective arguments.R 99(2) does not exclude that such evidence is submitted for the first time in appeal proceedings nor does it require that this evidence is admitted into the proceedings (see T 389/95 [1,3]).Therefore, the fact that the [opponent] relied inter alia on documents D6 to D13 in its statement setting out the grounds for appeal… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
IT DOESN'T MATTER, except when it does: "Race doesn't matter," the crowd chanted after Sen. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 861/93 [5-6] and T 28/93 [4.1]). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
In the Matter of Felton R. v Gloria P., Felton R. no longer wanted to be held to his paternal responsibilities. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, this provision has undergone some change when the EPC 2000 entered into force. [read post]